Upcoming Presentations

League for Innovation in the Community College

Beyond Engagement: Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Learning Online

Date & Time TBD

Students and faculty both encounter challenges in the online environment. These challenges frequently manifest and are understood in terms of low student engagement. In this session, researchers and community college faculty will present a specific and actionable framework to bolster students’ abilities to remain motivated and manage their learning processes in online courses. The presenters refer to these mutually reinforcing mindsets and behaviors as self-directed learning (SDL) skills and they include motivational processes (e.g., self-efficacy), metacognitive processes (e.g., planning), and applied learning processes (e.g., help seeking). Presenters will describe a set of evidence-based instructional strategies to support SDL developed in collaboration with instructors at broad-access institutions. Speakers will share research findings on how the strategies have been implemented in postsecondary online STEM courses and their effect on student outcomes. A community college faculty member will share their experience implementing the strategies in an online biology course.

Presenters

Ellen Wasserman, Research Associate, CCRC

Allystair Jones, Department Chair, Science & Professor of Biology, Odessa College

Keena Walters, Education Research Associate, SRI Education

Student Assessment and Placement Systems: Initial Outcomes From an RCT

League for Innovation in the Community College Annual Conference
March 20, 2018
National Harbor, MD

This forum was divided into three parts:

  1. First, presenters explained why there is a need to change assessment and placement practices, shared information on their approach to developing and testing an alternative strategy based on data analytics, and reported initial results from a randomized control trial testing this alternative mechanism against colleges’ prior test-based systems at participating SUNY community colleges.
  2. Second, presenters had participants engage in—and discuss—a short self-assessment of the conditions at their college that would support or hinder implementation of an alternative assessment and placement system.
  3. Third, representatives of two colleges discussed the way their institutions arrived at a decision to participate in this project as well as their initial impressions of how the new assessment and placement system has been experienced by college personnel and students.

Associated Papers

Participants

Senior Research Scholar Emeritus
Community College Research Center
Senior Research Associate
Community College Research Center
Michelle Ragucci
Testing Center Coordinator
Schenectady County Community College

Associated Project(s)