Skip to content
  • Research
  • About Us
  • News
  • Community College FAQs
  • Blog
  • Pandemic Recovery

Focus Areas

  • Dual Enrollment
  • Developmental Education
  • Guided Pathways
  • Advising & Student Supports
  • Teaching & Learning
  • Transfer
  • College to Career
Menu
  • Dual Enrollment
  • Developmental Education
  • Guided Pathways
  • Advising & Student Supports
  • Teaching & Learning
  • Transfer
  • College to Career

Publications Library

CCRC’s complete collection of publications

Presentations

Webinars and conference presentations with CCRC researchers

Guided Pathways Workshops

Materials from our do-it-yourself workshop series

Policy Resources

Our collection of federal policy briefs and fact sheets

  • CCRC Staff
  • Research Affiliates
  • Advisory Board
  • Employment
  • Biennial Report
  • Our History
  • Contact
Menu
  • CCRC Staff
  • Research Affiliates
  • Advisory Board
  • Employment
  • Biennial Report
  • Our History
  • Contact
  • CCRC in the News
  • Opinion
  • Press Releases
Menu
  • CCRC in the News
  • Opinion
  • Press Releases
  • Overview
  • Important Dates
  • FAQs
  • Overview
  • Important Dates
  • FAQs
  • Overview
  • Important Dates
  • FAQs

Multiple Measures Placement Using Data Analytics: An Implementation and Early Impacts Report

By Elisabeth A. Barnett, Peter Bergman, Elizabeth M. Kopko, Vikash Reddy, Clive Belfield & Susha Roy
Many incoming college students are referred to remedial programs in math or English based on scores they earn on standardized placement tests. Yet research shows that these tests do not always assess student skills accurately, and colleges that rely on them often assign students to remedial courses who could succeed in college-level courses. Seven community colleges in the State University of New York (SUNY) system are participating in a random assignment study of a multiple measures placement system based on data analytics to determine whether it yields placement determinations that lead to better student outcomes than a system based on test scores alone. This interim report from the Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness (CAPR) examines the implementation of the alternative placement system at the colleges and presents results on first-term impacts for a subset of the students in the study. The early findings show that:
  • Many program group students were placed differently than they would have been under the status quo placement system. In math, 14 percent of program group students placed higher than they would have under a test-only system (i.e., in college-level), while 7 percent placed lower (i.e., in remedial). In English, 41.5 percent placed higher, while 6.5 percent placed lower.
  • Program group students were 3.1 and 12.5 percentage points more likely than control group students to both enroll in and complete (with a grade of C or higher) a college-level math or English course in the first term.
  • Implementation of the alternative system added roughly $110 per student to status quo fall-term costs for testing and placing students at the colleges; ongoing costs in the subsequent fall term were roughly $40 per student above status quo costs.
The final report, to be released in 2019, will examine a range of student outcomes for three cohorts, including completion of introductory college-level courses, persistence, and the accumulation of college credits over the long term.
Download report
September 2018
Download executive summary
September 2018
View related blog post
September 2018
  • Center for the Analysis of Postsecondary Readiness (CAPR)

Related Publications

January 2021

Implementing and Scaling Multiple Measures Assessment in the Context of COVID-19

October 2020

Who Should Take College-Level Courses? Impact Findings From an Evaluation of a Multiple Measures Assessment Strategy

December 2019

Expanding Access to College-Level Courses

Related Presentations

October 2018

Student Assessment and Placement Using Multiple Measures

March 2018

Student Assessment and Placement Systems: Initial Outcomes From an RCT

January 2018

Emerging Student Assessment and Placement Systems

Additional Resources

For more policy briefs and fact sheets, visit CCRC’s Policy Resources page.

  • Our Research
  • About Us
  • News
  • Community College FAQs
  • Blog
  • Pandemic Recovery
  • Our Research
  • About Us
  • News
  • Community College FAQs
  • Blog
  • Pandemic Recovery

Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University
Box 174 | 525 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027

  • 212.678.3091
  • ccrc@columbia.edu

© 2025. All rights reserved.

Facebook-f Twitter Linkedin Youtube Instagram
Join our mailing list
  • Our Research
    • Focus Areas
    • Publications Library
    • Presentations
    • Guided Pathways Workshops
    • Policy Resources
  • About Us
    • CCRC Staff
    • Research Affiliates
    • Advisory Board
    • Employment
    • Biennial Report
    • Our History
    • Contact
  • News
  • Community College FAQs
  • Blog
  • Pandemic Recovery
  • Our Research
    • Focus Areas
    • Publications Library
    • Presentations
    • Guided Pathways Workshops
    • Policy Resources
  • About Us
    • CCRC Staff
    • Research Affiliates
    • Advisory Board
    • Employment
    • Biennial Report
    • Our History
    • Contact
  • News
  • Community College FAQs
  • Blog
  • Pandemic Recovery