Upcoming Presentations

DREAM 2025

February 18–21, 2025
Philadelphia, PA

More Essential than Ever: Community College Pathways to Educational and Career Success

February 19, 10:30–10:30 AM

In this session, CCRC researchers will review the research presented in CCRC's forthcoming book, More Essential than Ever: Community College Pathways to Educational and Career Success. They will highlight the need for, and strategies for scaling community colleges reforms in four key areas: 1) ensuring programs lead to good jobs and further education, 2) creating a more engaging recruitment and onboarding experience, 3) helping students complete their programs on schedule and affordably, and 4) rethinking dual enrollment as an on-ramp to college and career opportunity. They will describe the steps colleges and state agencies can take to plan for and implement these reform priorities.

Presenters

Davis Jenkins, Senior Research Scholar, CCRC

Hana Lahr, Assistant Director of Research and Director of Applied Learning, CCRC

Transforming Transfer: Findings from the New Edition of the Transfer Playbook

February 19, 12:30–1:00 PM

Community colleges play a pivotal role in shaping students’ educational journeys, yet far too few students achieve their aspirations of earning a bachelor’s degree. The Transfer Playbook 2.0 offers a comprehensive framework designed to address the persistent challenges of transfer student success, particularly for students of color and low-income students. This session will explore how community colleges can make transfer a presidential priority, align program pathways and high-quality instruction, and tailor advising and support services to foster trust and engagement.

The session will include data analysis from community colleges that have strong and equitable outcomes, as well as case studies that demonstrate how institutional leadership and cross-institutional partnerships can achieve large-scale success. Attendees will leave with clear, actionable steps to implement the Transfer Playbook 2.0 framework, helping them drive transfer success and improve bachelor’s degree attainment rates for their students, particularly those from historically underserved populations.

Presenters

Josh Wyner, Executive Director, College Excellence Program, The Aspen Institute

Pascale Charlot, Managing Director, College Excellence Program

Tatiana Velasco, Senior Research Associate, CCRC

Unlocking Opportunity: Eight Strategies To Strengthen the Value of Community College Credentials

February 19, 3:45–4:45 PM

Evidence consistently shows that fewer than half of certificate holders and associate degree holders earn more than $35,000 per year two years after completion—below most living-wage standards. And in both transfer and workforce pathways, students of color and low-income students are least likely to enroll in and complete programs that are aligned with high levels of post-graduation success.

Through the Unlocking Opportunity network, the Aspen Institute College Excellence Program and Community College Research Center have begun to address these challenges and gleaned early insights on how to improve post-graduation outcomes for community college students by ensuring that more students are on pathways that lead to living-wage jobs or efficient transfer and bachelor’s completion. During the session, attendees will learn about eight scaled areas of reform that have emerged from Unlocking Opportunity and how they might implement similar strategies at their own institution.

Presenters

Millicent Bender, Director - Leadership and Field Engagement, College Excellence Program

Davis Jenkins, Senior Research Scholar, CCRC

Marcia Ballinger, President, Lorain County Community College

Greg Williams, President, Odessa College

Jason Wood, President, Southwest Wisconsin Technical College

Diving DEEP: Dual Enrollment Equity Pathways as a Model for Increasing College Access

February 20, 10:30–11:30 AM

In this session, the Community College Research Center (CCRC) will describe how college/K12 partnerships have effectively expanded college access by extending guided pathway reforms to their dual enrollment programs with a focus on underserved students and high schools. CCRC will describe the dual enrollment equity pathways (DEEP) framework, including key practices, leadership strategies, and incentives for college and K12 partners. Leaders from Lee College and Miami Dade College will describe what DEEP practices they have scaled, how they are finding ‘win-wins’ with their K12 partners, and the outcomes they are seeing as a result. In a panel discussion, presenters will unpack the business models and economics of taking a DEEP approach to dual enrollment, highlighting case-making strategies for further investments in redesigning dual enrollment as an onramp to college and career opportunity.

Presenters

John Fink, Senior Research Assistant and Program Lead, CCRC

Aurely Garcia Tulloch, Senior Research Assistant, CCRC

Marissa Moreno, Associate Vice President of Transfer & Educational Partnerships, Lee College

Phil Giarraffa, Executive Director, Articulation & Academic Pathways, Miami Dade College

Building Students’ Confidence and Learning Skills in Online Classes: Lessons from the Postsecondary Collaborative

February 21, 9:00–10:00 AM

Online courses are popular with students and faculty. Their popularity belies a troubling reality: student outcomes in online courses are lower than those of in-person courses and minoritized students fare worse. What contributes to lower outcomes and inequities? Research suggests a range of contributors that show up as academic mindsets and behaviors that can undermine learning and achievement, such as weak motivation and depressed participation. The Postsecondary Teaching with Technology Collaborative is working to boost online course outcomes for minoritized students. It has developed technology-enabled instructional strategies designed to grow students’ self-directed learning (SDL), or how students manage their learning, in online STEM courses. In this session, researchers and faculty will present and discuss the evidence and intervention, share implementation successes and challenges, and explore case-making and implementation strategies.

Presenters

Krystal Thomas, Senior Education Researcher, SRI Education

Amy E. Brown, Research Associate, CCRC

2025 Innovations Conference

Month 9–12, 2025
San Antonio, TX

Beyond Engagement: Evidence-Based Strategies for Improving Learning Online

March 11, 2025 | 10:15–11:15 AM CT
Grand Hyatt San Antonio Riverwalk; Republic A-C, Fourth Floor

Students and faculty both encounter challenges in the online environment. These challenges frequently manifest and are understood in terms of low student engagement. In this session, researchers and community college faculty will present a specific and actionable framework to bolster students’ abilities to remain motivated and manage their learning processes in online courses. The presenters refer to these mutually reinforcing mindsets and behaviors as self-directed learning (SDL) skills and they include motivational processes (e.g., self-efficacy), metacognitive processes (e.g., planning), and applied learning processes (e.g., help seeking). Presenters will describe a set of evidence-based instructional strategies to support SDL developed in collaboration with instructors at broad-access institutions. Speakers will share research findings on how the strategies have been implemented in postsecondary online STEM courses and their effect on student outcomes. A community college faculty member will share their experience implementing the strategies in an online biology course.

Presenters

Ellen Wasserman, Research Associate, CCRC

Allystair Jones, Department Chair, Science & Professor of Biology, Odessa College

Hannah Cheever, Technical Assistance Provider and Education Researcher, SRI Education

2025 COABE National Conference

March 30–April 2, 2025
Dallas, TX

The Opportunities and Challenges of Community Colleges as Providers of Adult Education ESL

April 1, Time TBD

This session explores national research and practices in adult education (AE) English as a Second Language (ESL). Researchers from the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and the Community College Research Center (CCRC) will discuss the impact of federal and state AE policies on community colleges providing AE ESL. Drawing from new CCRC research, attendees will learn about opportunities, challenges, and innovative programming strategies that support multilingual learners’ academic and career success within current federal policy constraints.

Presenters

Julia Raufman, Research Associate, CCRC

Jacob Hofstetter, Research Analyst, Migration Policy Institute's National Center on Immigrant Integration Policy

2025 AERA Annual Meeting

April 23–27, 2025
Denver, CO

Adult Learners: Policy and Practice

April 24, 9:50–11:20 AM | Four Seasons Ballroom 1

As part of a roundtable discussion, the authors will present on a paper that presents findings on federal and state adult education English as a second language (AE ESL) policies, including the opportunities and challenges that these policies present for the delivery of AE ESL services within community colleges (CCs). CCs provide access to free or low-cost AE ESL courses and supportive services and have transformative potential for creating pathways to postsecondary education and occupational training for a wide range of multilingual learners (MLs). However, like other providers, CCs can struggle to fully meet this population’s needs, due to structural constraints, including limitations within the policies governing AE programming.

Presenters

Julia Raufman, Research Associate, CCRC

Nikki Edgecombe, Senior Research Scholar, CCRC

George C. Bunch, Professor of Education and Department Chair, UC Santa Cruz

Implementing the Federal Work-Study Program: A Resource Utilization & Cost Study

What do community colleges and universities need to spend to administer and operate the Federal Work-Study Program (FWS)?

The FWS program is one of the oldest federal policy tools intended to promote college access and persistence for low-income students, pre-dating Pell Grants and Stafford Loans. Unlike other forms of federal student aid which are awarded to students on a formula basis, FWS allocations are granted in aggregate to institutions, which then have significant flexibility in implementing the program, including determining who receives an award and how much, and how students are connected to available jobs. Thus, the full resource cost for institutions to administer and operate FWS is quite different from the institutional allocation of FWS funds, and how much it actually costs institutions to administer and operate FWS is unknown.

We investigate what resources are required to administer and operate the FWS program at the City University of New York (CUNY), the single largest recipient of FWS funds nationally. This investigation is based on collected survey data and information from interviews at six CUNY’s community and senior colleges and student payroll records regarding the number of FWS jobs. We interviewed financial aid directors, FWS coordinators, and others involved in the implementation of the program at CUNY Central and at each participating institution. We analyze this evidence using the ingredients method where each resource is priced out to determine total resource cost.

To administer and operate FWS, institutions must commit resources to the following tasks: (1) accounting, compliance, and auditing of the FWS program; (2) program admission, placement and hiring; (3) overseeing and supervising FWS employment; and (4) processing contracts and payroll; and (5) manual packaging and distribution of discretionary funds. These resources include personnel, technology platforms and software, training, and materials. Since institutions have flexibility in terms of how they manage and operate FWS, the annual cost varies by institution and depending on the number of FWS students.

Institutions with relatively large numbers of FWS students have a FWS coordinator working full-time for the program with the support of at least two financial aid administrators with 60% of their work dedicated to FWS. These institutions also spend on a FWS software package used for online placement and hiring, electronic timesheet submission, tracking student earnings, managing the waitlist for the distribution of discretionary funds, and auditing and compliance. Institutions with fewer FWS students also have a FWS coordinator but that person typically works part-time for the program and without administrative support. At these institutions, FWS coordinators do not have access to a FWS software, which can make their job substantially more labor intensive.

The pandemic caused a few likely permanent changes in FWS training. Financial aid staff at all six institutions stopped attending in-person FWS trainings and workshops. FWS student and supervisor orientations are now delivered virtually at most institutions.

In this first-of-its-kind FWS cost study, we will calculate the full resource cost for institutions to administer and operate FWS and express this amount as total and net cost per student and per dollar of FWS allocation. The net cost will represent the amount of resources committed by the institution from participating in the FSW program.

Participants

Senior Research Associate and Program Lead
Community College Research Center
Research Associate
Community College Research Center

Associated Project(s)